Although amendments removed job killer provisions, twin recycling bills are still opposed by the California Chamber of Commerce and a coalition of industry groups because the legislation falls short of addressing fundamental, overarching concerns.
Even as amended, AB 1080 (Gonzalez; D-San Diego) and SB 54 (Allen; D-Santa Monica) set impractical recycling rates and deadlines, particularly due to a lack of sufficient infrastructure, and assurances that local jurisdictions and waste haulers will pull material through for all recyclable and compostable materials. Both bills ignore the lack of current recycling and composting infrastructure, and adequate funding mechanism for deploying the infrastructure at the local level to develop a robust functioning waste management system.
The bills now include all single-use packaging materials, such as glass, paper, plastic and metals, in the single-use packaging provisions. The bills also re-establish the prohibition on sale of packaging materials not meeting the recycling mandate (previously removed), as well as include language on the administrative civil penalty, creating an arbitrary, potentially limitless and unreasonable liability for producers that is not rationally related to the purported violation.
Moreover, under the bills, CalRecycle will have broad “fee authority” to implement the program with no cap on fees. Section 42080 gives CalRecycle authority to charge producers a regulatory fee without any accountability mechanism or incentive for the agency to contain its costs, operate efficiently, or be accountable to producers in incurring costs.
Additionally, CalRecyle will have the authority to impose such fees via emergency regulatory authority that provides a mere five days to comment, with no requirement for CalRecyle to respond to comments.
Friday is the deadline for bills to pass to the Governor.
Staff Contact: Adam Regele