Recent articles and videos from news sources that mention the California Chamber of Commerce (CalChamber.)

2018 >>


CalChamber Launches Podcast Focused On Workplace Issues
The California Chamber of Commerce (CalChamber) has launched its first podcast, “The Workplace.” The show focuses on “issues critical to California employers and employees.” Long Beach Business Journal, 3/6/19

Tracking Job Killer Bills
The California Chamber of Commerce identified its first “job killer” bill of 2019 in Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez Fletcher’s AB 51…CalChamber argues the legislation would expand litigation and increase costs for both employers and employees. (The Sacramento Bee, 3/5/19)

California Data Privacy Proposal May Give Law Tough New Teeth
“A private right of action on a law that is not yet cooked would be a disaster,” said Sarah Boot, a lobbyist for the California Chamber of Commerce. “It would be a class-action bonanza,” she testified at a hearing on Feb. 20 about the CCPA. (Bloomberg, 2/23/19)

California Republicans Just Elected Their First Female Party Chairperson, But The GOP Still Faces A Daunting Comeback
And yet, the party’s challenges remain just as steep as before. Strategist Marty Wilson, who runs the California Chamber of Commerce’s political operation, suggested there will likely be no quick fix. “I think what the GOP has to do is probably play small ball. Win where they can, hold what they’ve got, and start building towards the future,” Wilson said. (Capital Public Radio, 2/24/19)

Are You an Employee or a Contractor? Carpenters, Strippers and Dog Walkers Now Face That Question
The California Chamber of Commerce, business groups and Silicon Valley giants, seeking flexibility in how they hire, want Dynamex to be suspended, they wrote the Legislature, “before work opportunities are destroyed, and before the trial lawyers start crushing businesses with an onslaught of litigation.” (Los Angeles Times, 2/23/19)

California Lawmakers Toy With Idea Of Replacing Sales Tax With A Carbon Tax
What if products sold or used in California were taxed based on how much carbon is emitted during their production, not how much they cost? Some California lawmakers want to find out. Sarah Boot, with the California Chamber of Commerce, wrote a blog post about the bill saying “The goal is to use higher prices to influence Californians to purchase products in a way that is supposed to help reduce climate change.” (Capital Public Radio, 2/20/19)

California to Thrash Out Gig Worker Status in Upcoming Bills
“Dynamex jeopardizes work opportunities for millions of individuals who want to maintain independent contractor status for a host of reasons,” said Jennifer Barrera, executive vice president of the California Chamber of Commerce, which is spearheading the group. “I don’t think there’s an industry that isn’t affected by that decision,” she said, citing transportation, construction, health services, hairstylists and barbers, insurance agents, music teachers, freelance writers and editors, architects, engineers and lawyers as among those who might be affected. (San Francisco Chronicle, 2/4/19)

Tech, Labor and Newsom Search for Common Ground on the Future of Gig Workers
When can companies in California classify their workers as independent contractors instead of employees? Allan Zaremberg, head of the California Chamber of Commerce, said the ruling puts the Legislature in a unique position. A state law could override the court decision and return California to the pre-Dynamex test for employee status. “The Legislature has never developed a law on who’s an employee and who’s an independent contractor,” he said. (KQED, 1/19/19)

Air Board’s Plan to Raise Fees Threatens Our Economy and Climate Goals
California produces just 1 percent of atmospheric carbon emissions, yet global leaders and activists care about California regulations. Why is this? (Allan Zaremberg in CALmatters.org, 1/18/19)

SB 1300 Expands FEHA Litigation-Part II
In addition to the statutory changes described above, SB 1300 sets forth several statements of “legislative intent” about the application of FEHA in regard to harassment claims. The measure does so in Section One of the bill by adding Section 12923 to the Government Code that sets forth five statements “with regard to application of the laws about harassment contained in this part.” (Laura Curtis and Chris Micheli in Fox & Hounds Daily, 1/17/19)

SB 1300 Expands FEHA Litigation, But Employers and Lawyers Beware
Governor Jerry Brown signed Senate Bill 1300 (Jackson) on September 30, 2018 as Chapter 955. Among other provisions, this comprehensive bill makes a number of statutory changes for litigating sexual harassment claims and prohibits employers from requiring employees to sign a release of claims under the Fair Employment and Housing Act in exchange for a raise or as a condition of employment. (Laura Curtis and Chris Micheli in Fox & Hounds Daily, 1/16/19)

In 2019, California Workers Gain on Pay and Working Conditions. Employers Say it Will be Costly
The California Chamber of Commerce nonetheless boasted of fending off all 29 bills on its annual “Job Killers” list — legislation it claimed would “decimate economic and job growth.” Its biggest win: Gov. Jerry Brown’s September veto of Assembly Bill 3080, a measure to curb businesses’ ability to force workers into private arbitration, preventing them from filing lawsuits over sexual harassment, wage theft, discrimination and other complaints. Brown cited recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions affirming mandatory arbitration policies, saying the California bill “plainly violates federal law” — a stance disputed by proponents. “We know many of these job-killing proposals will return next session,” said CalChamber President and CEO Allan Zaremberg. “But legislators need to understand that California employers have reached their limit with respect to new laws and regulations that increase costs through threat of litigation.” (Los Angeles Times, 1/1/19)